Signal · OPAT
PICCs carry far fewer complications than midline catheters in outpatient antimicrobial therapy, US cohort finds
A US retrospective cohort of over 1,100 outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy patients finds midline catheters carry more than three times the complication risk of peripherally inserted central catheters.
A single-centre US retrospective cohort study in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology followed 1,169 patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and found complications — bloodstream infection or venous thrombosis — occurred more often with midline catheters (6.4 per 1,000 line-days) than with peripherally inserted central catheters, or PICCs (1.1 per 1,000 line-days), an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.60 (95% confidence interval 1.66–7.81) [Primary Study].
This is a single-centre retrospective cohort, so the finding has not yet been replicated across other OPAT services or healthcare systems, and residual confounding by indication (why a particular device was chosen) cannot be fully excluded.
Vascular access device selection at the point of discharge is a decision made before a patient reaches community-based OPAT care, and this quantified complication difference is directly relevant to device-selection protocols wherever OPAT services choose between midlines and PICCs for anticipated therapy beyond a few days.
Sources
- Kim JJ, Ordaz-Nielsen G, Vu JB, et al. Complications in patients with midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2026. doi:10.1017/ice.2026.10512 PMID 42464627
