Signal · Frailty
An appraised evidence base for managing frailty in the emergency department
An integrative review appraises thirteen high-quality sources into thirty-four evidence-based insights, giving emergency departments a ready-made benchmark for frailty management.
An integrative review has appraised thirteen high-quality sources — three clinical guidelines, one randomised controlled trial, two clinical decision-making studies, two expert consensus documents, two cohort studies and three systematic reviews — into thirty-four evidence-based insights across ten themes for managing frailty in older patients attending the emergency department. Among the insights synthesised are a stratified screening-assessment-intervention-discharge continuous care protocol and a strategy for an age-friendly emergency department environment.
Synthesis Because the review’s contribution is to appraise and synthesise existing high-quality evidence rather than to report a new primary finding, its practical value lies less in any single number than in what it offers as a benchmark: an emergency department can compare its own frailty pathway against a single, quality-graded evidence set, rather than sourcing guidance on screening, assessment, intervention, discharge planning and environment design separately from different places.
For emergency departments developing or auditing a frailty front door, this is a ready-made reference point for what current high-quality evidence recommends across the whole pathway, from first contact through to discharge — worth using as a checklist against existing local practice rather than treated as a single new intervention to adopt.
Sources
- Yuan M, et al. Best Evidence Summary for the Management of Frailty in Elderly Patients in Emergency Department: An Integrative Review. Nursing Open. 2026. doi:10.1002/nop2.70720 PMID 42528034
